Orbital-free density functional theory

Electronic structure methods
Valence bond theory
Coulson–Fischer theory
Generalized valence bond
Modern valence bond theory
Molecular orbital theory
Hartree–Fock method
Semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods
Møller–Plesset perturbation theory
Configuration interaction
Coupled cluster
Multi-configurational self-consistent field
Quantum chemistry composite methods
Quantum Monte Carlo
Density functional theory
Time-dependent density functional theory
Thomas–Fermi model
Orbital-free density functional theory
Linearized augmented-plane-wave method
Projector augmented wave method
Electronic band structure
Nearly free electron model
Tight binding
Muffin-tin approximation
k·p perturbation theory
Empty lattice approximation
GW approximation
Korringa–Kohn–Rostoker method
  • v
  • t
  • e

In computational chemistry, orbital-free density functional theory is a quantum mechanical approach to electronic structure determination which is based on functionals of the electronic density. It is most closely related to the Thomas–Fermi model. Orbital-free density functional theory is, at present, less accurate than Kohn–Sham density functional theory models, but has the advantage of being fast, so that it can be applied to large systems.

Kinetic energy of electrons

The Hohenberg–Kohn theorems[1] guarantee that, for a system of atoms, there exists a functional of the electron density that yields the total energy. Minimization of this functional with respect to the density gives the ground-state density from which all of the system's properties can be obtained. Although the Hohenberg–Kohn theorems tell us that such a functional exists, they do not give us guidance on how to find it. In practice, the density functional is known exactly except for two terms. These are the electronic kinetic energy and the exchangecorrelation energy. The lack of the true exchange–correlation functional is a well known problem in DFT, and there exists a huge variety of approaches to approximate this crucial component.

In general, there is no known form for the interacting kinetic energy in terms of electron density. In practice, instead of deriving approximations for interacting kinetic energy, much effort was devoted to deriving approximations for non-interacting (Kohn–Sham) kinetic energy, which is defined as (in atomic units)

T s = i 1 2 ϕ i | 2 | ϕ i , {\displaystyle T_{s}=\sum _{i}-{\frac {1}{2}}\langle \phi _{i}|\nabla ^{2}|\phi _{i}\rangle ,}

where | ϕ i {\displaystyle |\phi _{i}\rangle } is the i-th Kohn–Sham orbital. The summation is performed over all the occupied Kohn–Sham orbitals. One of the first attempts to do this (even before the formulation of the Hohenberg–Kohn theorem) was the Thomas–Fermi model, which wrote the kinetic energy as[2]

E TF = 3 10 ( 3 π 2 ) 2 3 [ n ( r ) ] 5 3 d 3 r . {\displaystyle E_{\text{TF}}={\frac {3}{10}}(3\pi ^{2})^{\frac {2}{3}}\int [n(\mathbf {r} )]^{\frac {5}{3}}\,d^{3}r.}

This expression is based on the homogeneous electron gas and, thus, is not very accurate for most physical systems. Finding more accurate and transferable kinetic-energy density functionals is the focus of ongoing research. By formulating Kohn–Sham kinetic energy in terms of electron density, one avoids diagonalizing the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian for solving for the Kohn–Sham orbitals, therefore saving the computational cost. Since no Kohn–Sham orbital is involved in orbital-free density functional theory, one only needs to minimize the system's energy with respect to the electron density.

References

  1. ^ Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. (1964). "Inhomogeneous Electron Gas". Physical Review. 136 (3B): B864–B871. Bibcode:1964PhRv..136..864H. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864.
  2. ^ Ligneres, Vincent L.; Emily A. Carter (2005). "An Introduction to Orbital Free Density Functional Theory". In Syndey Yip (ed.). Handbook of Materials Modeling. Springer Netherlands. pp. 137–148.


Stub icon

This quantum chemistry-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e